There is geographic variability in the clinical profile and outcomes of non-traumatic intracerebral hematoma (ICH) in the young, and data for the Philippines is lacking. We aimed to describe this in a cohort from the Philippines, and identify predictors of mortality.

We performed a retrospective study of all patients aged 19-49 years with radiographic evidence of non-traumatic ICH admitted in our institution over five years. Data on demographics, risk factors, imaging, etiologies, surgical management, in-hospital mortality, and discharge functional outcomes were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to determine factors predictive of mortality.

A total of 185 patients were included, which had a mean age of 40.98 years and a male predilection (71.9%). The most common hematoma location was subcortical, but it was lobar for the subgroup of patients aged 19-29 years. Overall, the most common etiology was hypertension (73.0%), especially in patients aged 40-49. Conversely, the incidence of vascular lesions and thrombocytopenia was higher in patients aged 19-29. Surgery was done in 7.0% of patients. The rates of mortality and favorable functional outcome at discharge were 8.7% and 35.1%, respectively. Younger age (p = 0.004), higher NIHSS score on admission (p=0.01), higher capillary blood glucose on admission (p=0.02), and intraventricular extension of hematoma (p = 0.01) predicted mortality.

In the Philippines, the most common etiology of ICH in young patients was hypertension, while aneurysms and AVM’s were the most common etiology in the subgroup aged 19 – 29 years. Independent predictors of mortality were identified.

In the Philippines, the most common etiology of ICH in young patients was hypertension, while aneurysms and AVM’s were the most common etiology in the subgroup aged 19 – 29 years. Independent predictors of mortality were identified.

Testing for thrombophilic disorders is often performed in patients after cryptogenic ischemic stroke in an attempt to identify a hematologic explanation for the event. However, the role of commonly tested thrombophilias in ischemic stroke is poorly defined. There is limited evidence to quantify how these disorders affect ischemic stroke risk and testing practices are highly variable.

Retrospective evaluation of thrombophilia testing practices and clinical outcomes was performed in hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke (n = 1898) at a large academic hospital over a two-year period. Variables assessed included testing components, timing of testing, number of abnormal results, and frequency of change in clinical management prompted by abnormal results. A provider survey was also performed to assess perceptions of current testing practices and provider understanding of testing indications.

Thrombophilia testing was performed in 190 (10%) patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke. Of those testeic stroke, yet testing only changed management in 2% of patients. Efforts to improve provider education and the stewardship of testing are needed to ensure appropriate evaluation and treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Stroke-related visual impairment and atrial fibrillation are both common following stroke. This study explores whether presence of visual impairment following stroke is associated with presence of atrial fibrillation (AF).

The Impact of Visual Impairment after Stroke (IVIS) study is a multi-centre, acute stroke unit, prospective epidemiology study. Standardised visual assessments included visual acuity, reading, visual fields, eye movements and visual perception. AF and blood pressure (BP) were measured on admission. Further data capture included stroke type, age, gender, stroke severity. Analysis included descriptive statistics, independent samples analysis and multivariate analysis for comparison of AF and visual impairment against covariates.

1500 stroke admissions were recruited of which 1204 stroke survivors had visual assessment. New onset stroke-related visual impairment (n = 703) was significantly associated with older age and stoke severity. AF and BP data were available for 889 stroke survivort associated with type of visual impairment or extent of visual recovery. It remains unknown if AF causes more severe visual impairment.

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have been postulated to be useful in predicting recovery in patients with motor impairment. We aimed to investigate whether MEPs elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), serum brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its genotype have prognostic value on stroke recovery in patients with hand paresis due to stroke.

This was an observational cohort study. click here Patients underwent TMS with MEPs from abductor digiti minimi evaluation between 2-14 (D0) and 30 days (D30) after stroke and their impact on motor function of the upper limb and general outcome was assessed after 3 months (D90). The presence of a BDNF gene polymorphism was determined and serum BDNF concentrations were measured at D0, D30 and D90.

The presence of MEPs and their amplitude at rest and in effort significantly correlated with improvement of upper-limb paresis and general outcome after 3 months. Resting motor threshold did not have prognostic value. Central motor conduction time and MEP latency less consistently predicted stroke outcome or motor deficit improvement. Neither BDNF polymorphisms nor BDNF concentration at D0, D30 and D90 corresponded with the degree of paresis or the independence of patients 3 months after stroke.

The presence of MEPs and their amplitude are useful predictors of upper-limb motor function recovery and general outcome after stroke. BDNF concentration and its genotype had no prognostic value. Further studies conducted on large cohorts are necessary to determine the usefulness of these methods in motor recovery and stroke outcome prediction.

The presence of MEPs and their amplitude are useful predictors of upper-limb motor function recovery and general outcome after stroke. BDNF concentration and its genotype had no prognostic value. Further studies conducted on large cohorts are necessary to determine the usefulness of these methods in motor recovery and stroke outcome prediction.