• Corbett Malik posted an update 1 month, 3 weeks ago

    Just one Organization Knowledge about Consistent Aim and Very subjective Scar Examination Whilst Considering Fraxel Ablative Fractional co2 Laser skin treatment.

    This work described the development of a novel method for simultaneous extraction of eight active compounds (including catechin, albiflorin, paeoniflorin, ferulic acid, ginsenoside Rg1, tetrahydropalmatine, ginsenoside Rb1 and osthole) from Yaobitong capsule by accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). Response surface methodology (RSM) with desirability functions was employed to optimize the extraction conditions yielding the optimal conditions of ASE (extraction time 8 min, extraction temperature 80 °C, extraction solvent 70% methanol and flushing volume 100%). A high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) method was developed and validated for simultaneous quantification of the eight compounds in Yaobitong capsule. The values of correlation coefficient (R) were satisfactory between 0.9992 and 0.9999 over the linear concentration range of 0.5-1000 μg mL-1. It was found that the limits of detection (LODs) and the limits of quantification (LOQs) for the eight active compounds were 0.10-2.90 μg•mL-1 and 0.30-9.40 μg•mL-1, respectively. The recoveries of the eight main active compounds in Yaobitong capsule were in the range of 93.31%-106.22%. And the contents of the analytes extracted by ASE under the optimal conditions were compared to traditional solvent extraction methods, such as ultrasonic and reflux extraction. The results indicated that the ASE method proved to be more suitable for the extract of active compounds in Yaobitong capsule, which could obtain higher extraction efficiency. At last, the proposed method was applied to analyze ten batches of actual samples, which provided high extraction efficiency and had wide potential application in the analysis of traditional Chinese medicines. V.OBJECTIVES Second-line chemotherapy is not a standard of care in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) that progresses after first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed. In pre-clinical models, the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and imatinib mesylate (IM), compared with GEM alone, led to a further tumor growth inhibition and improved survival. This phase II study evaluates the antitumor activity of a combination of IM and GEM in platinum-pemetrexed-pretreated MPM patients expressing PDGFR-β and/or cKIT by immunohistochemistry (IHC). PATIENTS AND METHODS GEM (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 3 and 10; IM (400 mg) was taken orally on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the 3-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The study follows the optimal two-stage design of Simon. A 3-month PFS target of 75 % was required. With a probability error α = 10 % and a power of 80 %, the calculated sample size was 22 patients. In particular, in the first step, six out of nine patients and globally 14/22 patients free from progressive disease at 3 months were required. Secondary endpoints included response rate, duration of response, toxicity and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 23 patients were enrolled (ECOG PS 0-1/2 9/13; one previous line/≥two previous lines 10/13). Partial response was achieved in four patients (17.4 %) and stable disease in 11 (47.8 %) with a disease control rate of 65.3 %. After a median follow-up of 34.5 months, median PFS and OS were 2.8 and 5.7 months, respectively. The 3-month PFS rate was 39.1 % (9/23 patients). All-grade drug-related adverse events occurred in 17 (73.9 %) patients. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in four (17 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS The combination of IM and GEM is well tolerated in platinum-pemetrexed-pretreated MPM patients expressing PDGFR-β and/or cKIT by IHC, but it does not show a significant PFS benefit. BACKGROUND The poor evidence base is a major problem for the German rehabilitation sector. This trial focused on testing the efficacy and benefit of inpatient medical rehabilitation compared to routine care in a single common entity, namely, chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS This pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design included gainfully employed patients with IBD who were covered by one of four statutory health insurance providers. Patients in the intervention group were actively advised regarding options for rehabilitation and given support in applying for it; patients in the control group continued with the care they had been receiving before participation in the trial. The primary endpoint was social participation, and there were various secondary endpoints, including disease activity and sick days taken off from work. All parameters were assessed by questionnaire at the beginning of the trial and twelve months later. This was trial no. DRKS00009912 in the German clinical trials registry. RESULTS In a complete case analysis, the intervention group (211 patients, of whom 112 underwent rehabilitation) did better than the control group (220 patients, of whom 15 underwent rehabilitation) in multiple respects. The reported limitation in social participation was reduced by 7.3 points in the intervention group and 2.9 points in the control group (p = 0.018; d = 0.23). Significant improvements were also seen in disease activity, vitality, health-related quality of life, and self-management, with effect sizes between 0.3 and 0.4. No benefit was seen in outcomes related to working capacity. Sensitivity analyses lent further support to the findings. click here click here CONCLUSION Rehabilitation research can be conducted with individually randomized, controlled trials. The findings of this trial indicate the absolute effectiveness of ied rehabilitation for IBD patients, as well as its additional benefit compared to routine care.BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections are among the more common types of nosocomial infection in Germany and are associated with catheters in more than 60% of cases. With increasing rates of antibiotic resistance worldwide, it is essential to distinguish catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria from catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI). METHODS This review is based on publications from January 2000 to March 2019 that were retrieved by a selective search in Medline. Randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews in which the occurrence of CA-UTI in adult patients was a primary or secondary endpoint were included in the analysis. Two authors of this review, working independently, selected the publications and extracted the data. RESULTS 508 studies were identified and 69 publications were selected for analysis by the prospectively defined criteria. The studies that were included dealt with the following topics need for catheterization, duration of catheterization, type of catheter, infection prophylaxis, education programs, and multiple interventions.